- the typical sexual predator claims 300 victims in a career. I'm torn on the idea of trying to treat this as if it were a public health problem, using motivational posters and briefings. In fact, this film brutally rips the current SAPR/BIT/SHARP programs as ineffective at best, or PR distractions at worst.
- the film's showcase assault survivors bear the scars of the assault, but even worse scars from the coverups and declined or bungled investigations after the fact. It's worth asking whether these survivors would have recovered and continued purposeful lives and successful military careers if the commanders had investigated and prosecuted the assaults more vigorously. What do we know about survivors whose perpetrators have been prosecuted fully? The film shows that most perps get weak punishment, assuming that the perps were guilty. I will not support abandonment of presumed innocence.
- the survivors had peers, both male and female, who supported them and encouraged them to report the assaults and seek justice, as well as peers who tried to persuade them to stay silent. The latter will always bend in the direction of the wind. Commanders and enforcers make the coverup possible, thus making future assaults inevitable.
- something is genuinely dicked up with the Feres doctrine. There's a reason I'm not a lawyer and the preceding sentence shows it.